Cardinals: Ranking the rumored extension candidates for St. Louis

The St. Louis Cardinals appear to be done with most of their major business this off-season, signing Willson Contreras to succeed Yadier Molina behind the plate in 2023. While they may not make any other significant moves between now and Opening Day, they are reportedly looking to extend some of their arbitration-eligible players.

According to John Denton of MLB.com, the Cardinals had hopes of agreeing to long-term extensions with Jordan Montgomery, Jack Flaherty, Tommy Edman, and Ryan Helsley before the arbitration deadline on Friday. They were unable to do so, instead settling with Montgomery, Flaherty, and Edman while heading to arbitration with Helsley. This raises an interesting question, which of the four should the Cardinals prioritize in extension talks?

An argument can be made for all four of these players that it would be in the Cardinals' best interest to retain them for their long-term plans. Both Flaherty and Montgomery would add another arm to their 2024 rotation and beyond, that currently only has one returning member beyond this season in the form of Steven Matz. Ryan Helsley just had an incredible season as the club's closer, and will likely become expensive in arbitration if he repeats that again in 2023. Edman has become one of the most valuable position players for St. Louis, playing elite defense and being a consistent contributor for the lineup.

It's highly unlikely they'll be able to extend all four of them, but it is realistic to think that one or two of these players could receive a long-term extension before the regular season begins. Here is how I would rank the four players in terms of who the Cardinals should prioritize extending.

#4 - Ryan Helsley

The tough part about this list is that all four guys would be great extension candidates. But if I had to put them in order, Ryan Helsley would be the least pressing of the candidates.

For starters, Helsley has multiple years of club control remaining, so there is no rush to get an extension done with the flamethrower. Yes, his extension number will rise significantly if he repeats his 2022 performance or even comes close to it, but that is a risk that is probably worth taking for the Cardinals. Unless Helsley is looking for a very team-friendly deal this off-season, it could be risky extending him.

Helsley had a career year in his age-27 season, posting a 1.25 ERA with a 13.08 K/9 in 64.2 innings of work. He was dazzling fans and experts alike with his fastball velocity and ability to throw hitters off with great off-speed options. While his stuff should continue to play, relievers are notorious for falling off at any moment. Without much of a track record outside of last season,

That is taking nothing away from the player Helsley has become. This has more to do with risk versus reward. St. Louis appeared to be open to dealing Helsley this off-season for a new catcher, and that likely had more to do with how the game values relievers rather than his ability. If the Cardinals do extend him, I don't think any of us would mind that at all.

#2 - Jack Flaherty

One of the most devise players amongst Cardinals fans, Jack Flaherty is entering the most important season of his career in 2023 and could reestablish himself as one of the best pitchers in all of baseball.

Extending him now would be a high-risk, high-reward move for the club. His value is not as high as it could be after the 2023 season, so the Cardinals may be able to strike a bargain similar to the Tyler Glasnow extension that the Rays handed out. It would likely be a 2-3 year deal at most but would keep him in St. Louis as a cheaper AAV than he would have on the open market as Flaherty looks to up his value once again.

Why would Flaherty do this? Well, he just recently turned 27, so he does not need to lock himself into a long-term deal yet if he thinks he can get back to his 2019 production, where he went 11-8 with a 2.75 ERA and had a historic second-half showing. Still, his injuries the last few years adds risk to a large multi-year deal, so Flaherty could ensure he gets paid in case of injury over the next few years, but the hope would be for both sides that he rebuilds his value before entering free agency for a massive deal at age 30 or 31.

I know there is going to be a group of people who balk at this idea, but if Flaherty is open to it, the Cardinals should seriously consider it. I'm not talking about some massive 6-year extension. I'm looking at a 2-3 year deal between $15-$18 million per season. The Cardinals get a $10-$15 million per year discount than what Flaherty would receive on the open market if he returns to form in 2023. If Flaherty does not return to full form but remains healthy, he'll likely pitch well enough to at least justify that number as well. The only way this deal goes wrong is if he continues to struggle with major injuries.

#1 - Tommy Edman

Tommy Edman has quickly become one of the most valuable players on the Cardinals' roster. The 27-year-old has already won a Gold Glove at second base and should have won it at shortstop in 2022 as well. Edman should provide value for years to come, whether it's at shortstop or as a utility man.

Since St. Louis decided to pass on the shortstop market once again this off-season, they are really puttting their eggs in the Tommy Edman basket for at least 2023 and likely beyond. Masyn Winn is an exciting shorstop prospect, but likely won't be able to handle the positon everyday until 2024 at the earliest. Edman should maintain a hold at shortstop until that day comes, and then can provide elite value in a "Ben Zobrist" type role for the club.

After putting up a .725 OPS in 2022, Edman proved his bat can play everyday for St. Louis. Even if Winn comes up and surplants him at the shortstop position, Edman would provide massive value for the Cardinals sliding back over to second base, or filling it at almost every position on the diamond whenever he is needed.

If Nolan Gorman and Brendan Donovan continue to blossom alongside Winn, the Cardinals would have strong trade assets to go out and acquire someone at a position of need, or just have a wealth of middle infield depth. Edman could even become a trade chip himself if the Cardinals so choose, especially if he is locked up on a multi-year deal that buys out some of his free-agent years. Even with some regression, Edman would still be a valuable player around baseball and would not be hard to move off of.

I think that is what ultimately makes Edman the number one target for an extension at this moment. He is the safest bet to be a valuable contributor for years to come, has multiple paths toward having an important role with the club, and should be a valuable asset should the Cardinals decide to move off of him. Outside of major regression or injuries, giving Edman an extension has very little risk involved, assuming the deal is team friendly.

Who would you extend out of these four arbitration eligible players? Do you see the Cardinals extending any of them before the regular season? Let me know below!