4 reasons why the Cardinals would be insane to trade Paul Goldschmidt

I get it, things are bleak once again for the St. Louis Cardinals.

But unless the organization believes that they are years away from contending again, the idea of trading Paul Goldschmidt is crazy. Yet, the idea seems to be running rampant.

The speculation really began to increase after a story from ESPN's Jeff Passan was posted this past week. Passan said that one GM wondered, if they bottom out, "might the Cardinals consider moving reigning NL MVP Paul Goldschmidt?"

One general manager wondered. Hardly a substantial rumor if we are being honest with ourselves, and yet, it feels like people have run with that comment and acted as though the Cardinals are seriously considering moving their future Hall of Fame first baseman.

Even if the Cardinals are not considering that move right now, there is still a segment of the St. Louis fanbase that believes they should consider this. Some people are going to read this article and think that belief is nonsense or that it's not a real thought among fans, but it is. I don't think it's the majority of the fanbase by any means, but the belief has grown.

You saw the headline. I obviously don't think this is a good idea, and I want to break down further why I think this would be a huge mistake by the Cardinals' front office if they chose to trade Goldschmidt.

Here are four reasons why the Cardinals would be insane to consider trading Paul Goldschmidt

Reason #1 - The team's lone strength, their offense, would be significantly weakened

I know the Cardinals' offense has cooled off recently, but even with the recent cold streak, they still rank top 10 in all of baseball in OPS, SLG, wRC+, and position player WAR. Paul Goldschmidt is a huge part of that.

On the season so far, Goldschmidt is .286/.385/.491 with 10 HR and 27 RBI. I know many have felt like his ability with runners in scoring position has been a huge weakness this year, but that's not even close to being a good reason to move him. He's still slashing .260/.397/.380 with runners in scoring position, and I doubt he doesn't improve that slash line as the season goes on.

I have also seen that people believe trading Goldschmidt would be an opportunity to improve the Cardinals pitching staff, and I just don't see how the return would outweigh the loss you're experiencing (more on that later). Trading your best player and thinking it will make you better in the near future is not the case. Goldschmidt makes the Cardinals a dangerous offense, and without him, the lineup is much weaker.

Just look at a potential lineup if the Cardinals sent Goldschmidt elsewhere...

1. LF Lars Nootbaar
2. RF Jordan Walker
3. DH Nolan Gorman
4. 3B Nolan Arenado
5. C Willson Contreras
6. SS Paul DeJong
7. 1B Juan Yepez/Luken Baker
8. 2B Brendan Donovan
9. CF Tommy Edman

I mean, are we really serious that we think that is the lineup you want to roll with right now? It's still a quality lineup, but you're removing one of the best bats in our game today, I just do not see how that is the best thing for this team.

Let's look at the package they could get back and why I don't see that as a fit either...

Reason #2 - The Cardinals would not get enough in return to make a Paul Goldschmidt trade worth it

It's hard to find fair comparisons to a potential Goldschmidt trade due to his unique situation as a reigning MVP who is in his mid-30s and still playing at an All-Star level. So let's look at the return of an All-Star first baseman that was dealt two offseasons ago, Matt Olson.

Olson was traded to the Braves for prospects C Shea Langeliers, OF Christan Pache, RHP Ryan Cusick, and RHP Joey Estes. Langeliers was the 73rd-ranked prospect in baseball, Pache was a former top prospect but had fallen a ton in his status among talent evaluators, while Cusick and Estes ranked 16th and 26th in the Athletics own farm system upon their acquisition.

Olson wasn't coming off an MVP season, but he did post a .911 OPS for the Athletics the prior season, was an All-Star, finished 8th in MVP voting, and was only 27 years old and had two years left of club control before he hit free agency. That's a very valuable player, and that's the return the A's got back for him.

That doesn't mean the Cardinals couldn't get more for Goldschmidt, but coming up on his 36th birthday and being a year away from free agency, it doesn't feel like the package in return would be much better than the Athletics got for Olson. So is that really going to entice the Cardinals to give up Goldschmidt?

Some would say "Well, trade him for an established ace then", but no team trading for Goldschmidt is going to do that. If a team is interested in him at the deadline, they are contenders. Contenders will part with prospects and fringe MLB talent, but they aren't going to give up a front-line starter to acquire a bat. That's just not how teams operate.

Beyond 2023, there are plenty of reasons for the Cardinals to hold onto Goldschmidt.

Reason #4 - Paul Goldschmidt can help this team in 2025 and beyond

It's hard to say how much longer Paul Goldschmidt will be an All-Star level player, but if I had to bet right now, I still think he's at least playing at that level through the 2025 season, even if he's not the MVP he once was.

Goldschmidt hasn't really shown true signs of slowing down, and although that could turn sideways in the next 12 months, I'd bet against that. If you look at Goldschmidt's Baseball Savant page, you'll actually see improvement in almost every underlying statistic from his 2022 MVP year, as he is barreling the ball up more, making harder contact, and has a higher expected batting average and slugging percentage.

As this team continues to bring up young talents like Jordan Walker, Masyn Winn, Tink Hence, Cooper Hjerpe, and others, along with Nolan Gorman, Brendan Donovan, and Matthew Liberatore, they are best set up for success by meeting their promotions with a strong veteran group of players that are already on the roster and more that they can acquire in free agency and trade. If they play their cards right, they can utilize the cost-controlled years of that young talent to spend on other positions, and really increase their chances from 2024-2026.

If they choose to trade Goldschmidt now, they are giving up a blue-chip talent for a prospect package that I doubt will measure up to the production he gives another team, and the money they "save" would not be enough to replace his presence.

We can revisit this conversation in July if the team completely falls apart and it looks like a true rebuild is needed. But if this continues to look more like a retool is needed, then Goldschmidt should not be on the table in trade negotiations.