The Cardinals would make a huge mistake signing these starting pitchers

BOSTON, MA - OCTOBER 4: Nathan Eovaldi #17 of the Boston Red Sox pitches against the Tampa Bay Rays during the second inning at Fenway Park on October 4, 2022 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo By Winslow Townson/Getty Images)
BOSTON, MA - OCTOBER 4: Nathan Eovaldi #17 of the Boston Red Sox pitches against the Tampa Bay Rays during the second inning at Fenway Park on October 4, 2022 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo By Winslow Townson/Getty Images)
2 of 3
Next

The St. Louis Cardinals may decide to spend money on a starting pitcher this offseason, but signing any of these players would be a major mistake.

With money to spend this offseason, the St. Louis Cardinals may find themselves handing out some pretty big contracts. Even though fans would love them to spend money, who they spend it on matters a lot.

When it comes to the shortstop market, I detailed out how signing Dansby Swanson would be a huge mistake for St. Louis, although any of the other big name shortstops would be major upgrades. The club appears to be sticking with their internal options as of now.

When it comes to the starting pitching market, St. Louis only has one starter under contract past 2023 in Steven Matz, so acquiring another starter on a multi-year deal would make a lot of sense. What the Cardinals really need though is a front-line starter, and free agency and the trade market have some available.

The Cardinals are being linked to a whole bunch of starters, and each of the following would be a huge mistake if the club signed them to big contracts.

Nathan Eovaldi

Pitching for the Boston Red Sox since 2018, Nathan Eovaldi was among the best pitchers in the game in 2021, finishing 4th in the AL Cy Young voting after going 11-9 with a 3.75 ERA, accompanied with an AL Leading 2.79 FIP. The Athletic’s Jim Bowden has him linked to the Cardinals and is projecting a 4-year, $90 million contract.

At 32-years old, it is tough to see how paying Eovaldi an AAV of $22.5 million over 4-years would be a wise move for the club. Eovaldi’s only elite season was in 2021, and outside of that, he has been a good, but not great, pitcher. In 2022, his ERA rose to 3.87 and his FIP came crashing back down to earth at 4.30. Not good signs for an aging starter.

On top of that, Eovaldi has had injury concerns throughout his career and once again dealt with them in 2022. Although the starter fits what the Cardinals are looking for in a guy with elite stuff who strikes out batters (average 9.1 K/9 during his time in Boston), the price tag, injury history, and lack of consistency should scare St. Louis away.

Chris Bassitt #40 of the New York Mets pitches during the game against the Oakland Athletics. (Photo by Michael Zagaris/Oakland Athletics/Getty Images)
Chris Bassitt #40 of the New York Mets pitches during the game against the Oakland Athletics. (Photo by Michael Zagaris/Oakland Athletics/Getty Images) /

Chris Bassitt

After being linked to the Cardinals on the trade market last offseason, the New York Mets pulled off a trade for Oakland’s All-Star starter Chris Bassitt, who in turn was a great addition to their rotation in 2022. Although he is a high-quality starter, the Cardinals would be adding a very similar starter to what they already have at a big price tag.

Bowden is currently projecting the 33-year old to command a 4-year, $74 million deal in free agency, putting him at an AAV of $18.5 through his age-37 season. If the Cardinals needed a number two starter or great number three, this would be an awesome signing. Bassitt went 15-9 with a 3.42 ERA in 30 starts this past season, and has been a durable and consistent pitcher for most of his career.

Bassitt lacks the top end talent that the Cardinals need as their number one starter. It’s not that Bassitt would be a bad addition to their rotation, but does he really match up with guys like Jacob deGrom, Spencer Strider, Zach Wheeler, Joe Musgrove, or any of the other top end starters in the National League?

If the Cardinals end up dealing any starters away, he may be an interesting fit. But right now, they need to go after top-end starters, and Bassitt is just on the outside of that.

York Yankees starting pitcher Jameson Taillon (50) pitches against Houston Astros. Mandatory Credit: Thomas Shea-USA TODAY Sports
York Yankees starting pitcher Jameson Taillon (50) pitches against Houston Astros. Mandatory Credit: Thomas Shea-USA TODAY Sports /

Jameson Taillon

The Cardinals found a lot of success in bringing over another Yankees starter in the form of Jordan Montgomery during the season, and now find themselves linked to New York free agent and former Pittsburgh Pirate Jameson Taillon.

Taillon is the least accomplished of the names on this list, having never been in the Cy Young voting like Eovaldi or Bassitt, and has never been named to an All-Star team. In 2022, Taillon threw 177 innings with a 3.92 ERA and 7.7 K/9. He’s a good starter, but if the Cardinals were to sign him to his projected 4-year, $70 million deal, that would be a huge waste of money.

Some would argue that Taillon is a guy due to breakout soon, as he has very good stuff and has spent his last few seasons in a very difficult American League East. The Cardinals need more certainty in their rotation though, not another “what if?”. Even if Taillon does breakout, it’s unlikely he pitches to the level of a true number one starter. And a $17.5 million a year, it’s not only not what the Cardinals need, but it seems like an overpay as well.

If the Cardinals sign a starter who is not of “ace” level this offseason, that is fine. Where they would be making a huge mistake is if they sign a starter who is not going to be their true number one to a large, multi-year contract. Spend big on an ace or do not spend big at all on starting pitching this offseason.

Next