
The St. Louis Cardinals have in their system a major powerhouse of a team in Memphis. These guys could likely go side-by-side with players in Boston.
The Boston Red Sox have a team ERA of 3.45. This ranks them as second place in all of the AL behind the Houston Astros at 3.00. The Memphis Redbirds have a team ERA of 3.54. The Redbirds’ ERA ranks them at the top of the PCL.
The Red Sox starting five goes as follows:
The Memphis Redbirds starting five goes as follows:
- Dakota Hudson (yes, I know he has been called-up but he has pitched 115 innings for the St. Louis Cardinals’ AAA team)
- Kevin Herget
- Daniel Poncedeleon (also now with the Cardinals)
- Austin Gomber (also now with the St. Louis Cardinals)
- Chris Ellis
When going side-by-side, let’s take a look to see if they match up.
Price vs. Hudson
David Price was at one time a trade target by the St. Louis Cardinals. The Cards failed to sign him and he ran to the American League even though he had reportedly stated that he wanted to join the St. Louis Cardinals. At the same time, Dakota Hudson was being groomed by the Cardinals.
Price’s line in 2018 is:
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | FIP | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 32 | BOS | AL | 11 | 6 | .647 | 3.93 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 128.1 | 117 | 59 | 56 | 18 | 39 | 0 | 124 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 533 | 112 | 4.11 | 1.216 | 8.2 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 8.7 | 3.18 | |
11 Yrs | 138 | 74 | .651 | 3.27 | 291 | 281 | 1 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 1874.2 | 1670 | 746 | 681 | 185 | 484 | 12 | 1800 | 53 | 4 | 36 | 7667 | 123 | 3.32 | 1.149 | 8.0 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 8.6 | 3.72 |
Hudson’s AAA line in 2018 is:
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | FIP | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 23 | STL-min | AAA | 13 | 3 | .813 | 2.50 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111.2 | 107 | 34 | 31 | 1 | 38 | 0 | 87 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 473 | 1.299 | 8.6 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 2.29 | MEM PCL | ||
1 Yr | 2 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.00 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2.43 | 0.429 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 4.00 | |||||
162 Game Avg. | 27 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.00 | 68 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 326 | 2.43 | 0.429 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 4.00 |
In this race, I’d take Hudson all day long. He hasn’t yet picked up the number of innings in MLB as Price, but his youth will only make him better.
Porcello vs. Herget
Again another competition of veteran vs. youngster but this one is more of what one might expect as opposed to the runaway competition above. Here too, when Porcello was in his early years, Herget was just cutting his teeth.
Here’s Porcello’s 2018 line:
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | FIP | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 29 | BOS | AL | 14 | 4 | .778 | 3.84 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 140.2 | 130 | 65 | 60 | 16 | 33 | 0 | 135 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 591 | 115 | 3.65 | 1.159 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 8.6 | 4.09 | |
10 Yrs | 132 | 103 | .562 | 4.22 | 301 | 297 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1812.1 | 1951 | 935 | 850 | 213 | 414 | 15 | 1309 | 71 | 7 | 63 | 7666 | 102 | 3.99 | 1.305 | 9.7 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 6.5 | 3.16 |
…and Herget’s 2018 AAA line:
Year | Age | AgeDif | Tm | Lg | Lev | Aff | W | L | W-L% | ERA | RA9 | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 26 | -0.6 | Memphis | PCL | AAA | STL | 4 | 2 | .667 | 4.62 | 5.05 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62.1 | 68 | 35 | 32 | 7 | 21 | 0 | 60 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 273 | 1.428 | 9.8 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 8.7 | 2.86 |
Year | Age | AgeDif | Tm | Lg | Lev | Aff | W | L | W-L% | ERA | RA9 | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W |
Minors (6 seasons) | Minors | 38 | 17 | .691 | 3.28 | 3.87 | 206 | 36 | 73 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 463.1 | 457 | 199 | 169 | 37 | 123 | 8 | 446 | 15 | 2 | 31 | 1926 | 1.252 | 8.9 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 8.7 | 3.63 | |||||
AAA (3 seasons) | Minors | 12 | 10 | .545 | 4.48 | 4.74 | 47 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 178.2 | 195 | 94 | 89 | 25 | 53 | 2 | 161 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 765 | 1.388 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 8.1 | 3.04 | |||||
AA (3 seasons) | Minors | 6 | 3 | .667 | 3.72 | 4.96 | 53 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 65.1 | 73 | 36 | 27 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 63 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 279 | 1.362 | 10.1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 8.7 | 3.94 | |||||
A+ (3 seasons) | Minors | 7 | 1 | .875 | 1.36 | 1.82 | 57 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 99.0 | 67 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 101 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 377 | 0.869 | 6.1 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 9.2 | 5.32 |
Notice that this race is considerably closer in numbers than the one above yet has a larger disparity between ERA. This is due in large part to the number of innings pitched– Porcello has pitched many more innings over Herget.
If we could fast-forward and see how Herget would fair at a full season, perhaps his numbers would be as impressive or more impressive than Porcello’s numbers.
Eovaldi vs. Poncedeleon
Too bad for Eovaldi that he doesn’t have the come-back story that Poncedeleon has. On the season, Eovaldi has a 3.38 ERA in his time with the Tampa Rays and now the Red Sox.
Pocedeleon’s come-back season has been stupendous. Where Eovaldi is a mid-season pick up, Poncedelon’s “rehab” season (from the frightening, near-death line-drive shot to the temple) has been a shot in the arm of the St. Louis Cadinals.
To the numbers, Eovaldi:
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | FIP | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 28 | TOT | AL | 5 | 4 | .556 | 3.38 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72.0 | 55 | 27 | 27 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 62 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 274 | 121 | 3.83 | 0.889 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 7.8 | 6.89 | |
2018 | 28 | TBR | AL | 3 | 4 | .429 | 4.26 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.0 | 48 | 27 | 27 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 53 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 224 | 94 | 4.27 | 0.982 | 7.6 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 8.4 | 6.63 | |
2018 | 28 | BOS | AL | 2 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.00 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 2.15 | 0.533 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 5.4 | 9.00 | ||
7 Yrs | 43 | 50 | .462 | 4.14 | 146 | 139 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 811.0 | 837 | 389 | 373 | 77 | 248 | 14 | 601 | 18 | 0 | 24 | 3449 | 96 | 3.85 | 1.338 | 9.3 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 6.7 | 2.42 |
The king of the comeback, Poncedeleon:
Year | Age | AgeDif | Tm | Lg | Lev | Aff | W | L | W-L% | ERA | RA9 | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 26 | -0.6 | Memphis | PCL | AAA | STL | 9 | 3 | .750 | 2.15 | 3.42 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 92.0 | 66 | 35 | 22 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 103 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 391 | 1.239 | 6.5 | 0.4 | 4.7 | 10.1 | 2.15 |
Minors (5 seasons) | Minors | 34 | 16 | .680 | 2.65 | 3.35 | 83 | 79 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 435.1 | 353 | 162 | 128 | 21 | 161 | 1 | 389 | 29 | 0 | 22 | 1820 | 1.181 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 2.42 |
This is an easy vote for me (albeit, I am biased to the lucky sucker because he is blessed and because he did an interview with me). The numbers don’t hurt either.
Pomeranz vs. Gomber
Like the other young arms before this comparison, Gomber is outstanding and already has my vote. But Pomeranz brings with him a great deal of experience too. Let’s dive right to the numbers.
Pomeranz:
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | FIP | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 29 | BOS | AL | 1 | 5 | .167 | 6.31 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51.1 | 61 | 37 | 36 | 10 | 32 | 0 | 44 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 240 | 70 | 5.95 | 1.812 | 10.7 | 1.8 | 5.6 | 7.7 | 1.38 | |
8 Yrs | 43 | 47 | .478 | 3.86 | 181 | 122 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 687.1 | 627 | 320 | 295 | 84 | 293 | 7 | 665 | 17 | 2 | 31 | 2934 | 112 | 4.14 | 1.339 | 8.2 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 8.7 | 2.27 |
And Gomber:
Year | Age | AgeDif | Tm | Lg | Lev | Aff | W | L | W-L% | ERA | RA9 | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 24 | -2.6 | Memphis | PCL | AAA | STL | 7 | 3 | .700 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68.1 | 65 | 26 | 26 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 76 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 286 | 1.244 | 8.6 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 10.0 | 3.80 |
Minors (5 seasons) | Minors | 41 | 23 | .641 | 2.92 | 3.36 | 92 | 91 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 520.1 | 435 | 194 | 169 | 44 | 156 | 1 | 508 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 2131 | 1.136 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 8.8 | 3.26 |
Still, for my vote, I’m going Gomber.
Johnson vs. Ellis
I’m ashamed to say that I had no idea who Brian Johnson was but then again, I don’t watch American League games. Chris Ellis, on the other hand, was a name added to the St. Louis Cardinals when the team traded Jaime Garcia to the Braves. Oh, and the Cards got John Gant in that deal too.
To the numbers… Johnson:
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | FIP | WHIP | H9 | HR9 | BB9 | SO9 | SO/W | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 27 | BOS | AL | 2 | 3 | .400 | 3.74 | 28 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.0 | 70 | 30 | 27 | 9 | 22 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 282 | 118 | 4.02 | 1.415 | 9.7 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 8.7 | 2.86 | |
3 Yrs | 4 | 4 | .500 | 4.11 | 34 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 96.1 | 105 | 47 | 44 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 422 | 109 | 4.29 | 1.443 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 8.1 | 2.56 |
Ellis has pitched 60 innings acorss 11 starts posting a 4.92 ERA. Where Johnson is 27, Ellis is 25. In this race, the win goes to Johnson.