St. Louis Cardinals: Departed Players Are NOT Better

The St. Louis Cardinals allowed a few players to walk this offseason and traded others away.  As we reach the close of spring, there are many who are disappointed with the Cardinals performance, but are those departed players any better?

Players come and players go and this offseason was a busy one for the St. Louis Cardinals.  While we are told to read nothing into spring training statistics, this year’s club seems to continue its lackluster performance of old leading many to issue concern.  In thinking this way, one might easily fall prey to the thought that those departed players may well be out-performing this year’s squad, but is this a fallacy?

If we are going to examine this fallacy- which it surely is a fallacy- then we ought to compare the performance of the departed players to those who the Cardinals have kept on the squad and/or gained through the departures.

And, since we are told to read nothing into spring stats, we should compare these players using those stats to which nothing should be read.  At least in doing so, we will be comparing the same faulty statistics.

A further note about the stats to be used for comparison, for comparison ease I will focus these side-by-sides looking exclusively at offensive numbers with the exception of pitchers.  I will not examine defensive.

Why might you ask?  All the current complaints against the 2016 Cardinals seem to be circulating around the idea of another lame offensive year– so let’s see if the organization has reason to regret these lost players.

Moving one step beyond the statistical comparison, we should also look to see if we can predict whether the departed players will break camp with the MLB squad.  I mention this because I anticipate that some will not be set to break camp or even to make the active roster of their new landing spots.

Sit back and enjoy this rollercoaster ride through remaining and departed players.

Next: Pete Kozma

Center Fielders

St. Louis Cardinals sent Jon Jay and Peter Bourjos to the middle outfield position in 2015.  Both of these players were sent on their way during the winter of 2015.  Bourjos was sent packing due to his failed experiment (as it was often called) and Jay was used as a trade piece to land Jedd Gyorko.  Are Jay and Bourjos having a better spring than the Cardinals’ 2016 center fielders?

Let’s start by examining Jon Jay’s spring numbers:

These numbers, against AAA-equivalent players, are very respectable which indicates clearly the value of using Jay to gain Gyorko.  Before making drawing any conclusions as to whether Jay is better than the players on the 2016 roster, let’s turn our attention to Bourjos.

Bourjos too is posting respectable numbers (if only against AAA-equivalent players) but are these two players better than the Cardinals players?  To the numbers of the 2016 center fielders, Randal Grichuk and Tommy Pham.

First, Tommy Pham:

Pham, one year younger than Bourjos and three years younger than Jay, is posting lower numbers than the departed players.  That stated, Pham has recorded three stolen bases while only Boujos has recorded even one.  This is important as part of the Bourjos experiment was to provide speed to the Cardinals.  Pham is better, in this regard, to the departed players.

How about Grichuk?  Is he doing better than Jay and/or Bourjos?

As you can see here, Grichuk- seven years younger than Jay and five years younger than Bourjos- is out-performing the 2015 center fielders in all three fields of his slash line.

Taking these greater numbers into consideration and taking into consideration his younger age (and likely thereby longer trajectory with the team), Grichuk illustrates how the departed players are NOT better than what is on the squad this season.

Next: Tony Cruz

Tony Cruz- C

Like Kozma before him, I was never a fan of Tony Cruz.  I wanted to like him because something told me that I should like the backup to Yadier Molina considering Yadi’s increasing age but I simply couldn’t buy into like Cruz because of his poor defense, poor offense, and- to me- seeming ineptitude at calling a game (a must for a catcher).

Before showing Cruz’s 2016 spring numbers, let me assuage any naysayers who might attack me instantly should I compare Cruz to Molina– this is not my intent and not what I am going to do.  Instead, I will use this section to compare Cruz to the player added thanks to his departure, Brayan Pena.

Let’s look at Cruz’s 2016 spring thus far:

Is there anyone who even contemplates a desire to have this performance on the team?  These pitiful numbers are at the hands of players not even reaching the AAA-equivalency!  .118/.118/.147 in sixteen games?! No, thank you.

How about Pena?

While not astronomically better than Cruz, Pena’s years of experience shine brighter than that of Cruz.  It is tough to produce, as Pena might well see, in the shadow of Yadi.  What was at once promised as a setback for Yadi this spring and thereby additional playing time for Pena, has turned into just the opposite.

In spite of this, however, Pena is out-performing Cruz and is doing so with a much better demeanor– reporters gush about him being the happiest player they know.  Anyone want Tony Cruz back?

Next: John Lackey

John Lackey- RHP

This walk-away hurt the feelings of some Cardinal faithful.  I was not in this camp.  I liked Lackey, for sure, but was okay with him walking as he is growing older and I felt that the Cardinals got the best out of him possible and that “best” is less and less likely to be repeated.  Let’s look and see how he is doing this spring:

Wow.  Lackey, the workhorse of the 2015 Cardinals, has now allowed seventeen hits in thirteen innings this spring.  In addition, his ten- yes, 10- allowed earned runs has blown his ERA to a massive 6.92.  I, for one, do not want that in the Cardinals rotation.

In Lackey’s absence, the Cardinals’ plan was to replace him with David Price.  We all know how those negotiations ended.  Then came the idea that Marco Gonzales and/or Tim Cooney would hold down the fort which survived until Lance Lynn‘s elbow decided to go AWOL.  Enter, Mike Leake who has been referred to as the younger Lackey.

Let’s look:

Leake, nine years younger than Lackey, has pitched sixteen innings to Lackey’s thirteen innings and has held hitters to half the amount of earned runs and five additional strikeouts recorded compared to Lackey.  All of these better numbers contribute to Leake having an ERA of 2.81– a total of 4.11 points lower than Lackey’s ERA.

I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that Leake will post numbers this season strong enough to have him in Cy Young discussions while Lackey will not.  I’m going to also go out on a limb and predict that Lackey will have a very down year.  Wishful thinking?  Maybe, but I’d take Leake over Lackey as the numbers show now.

Next: Jason Heyward

Jason Heyward- RF

Everyone take a breath before we dive into this discussion.  We all know how painful the Jason Heyward departure was on Cardinals fans–most likely thanks to his going to the Cubs but also due to his comments explaining his reasoning.  That stated, let’s examine his spring numbers against Stephen Piscotty (at-best option) and Jeremy Hazelbaker (at-worst option).

First, though, Heyward-

Heyward is an outstanding player and that cannot be denied but these numbers do not paint that picture.  For whatever reason, these numbers are not painting the picture of the player fans watched in St. Louis in 2015.  It is early, and we can all very likely assume that these numbers will climb, but at this point I wonder how frustrated fans would be if Heyward was sporting the birds on the bat?

An interesting comparison is that of shocking Hazelbaker.  Let’s look at his spring numbers:

Hazelbaker is making a strong push to break camp with the major squad.  While these numbers are facing lesser-qualified players, Hazelbaker is currently posting better numbers than Heyward including three additional stolen bases!  In 2015, Heyward was heralded as a stolen base threat, yet now it seems that perhaps Hazelbaker is the stolen base solution?

Let’s turn our attention to the at-best option for 2016 right field, Stephen Piscotty:

More from St Louis Cardinals News

• Cardinals Rumors: 3 pros and cons of signing Carlos Rodon
• Cardinals: Here is Willson Contreras’ first message for St. Louis fans
• How do the St. Louis Cardinals stack up with Willson Contreras?
• Cardinals: The insane asking price the Athletics had for Sean Murphy
• St. Louis Cardinals: Ask me anything with Josh Jacobs – 12/8

Piscotty, one year younger than Heyward, is also posting better numbers at this point than Heyward.  While not posting the power of Heyward, Piscotty is crushing OBP numbers as compared to Heyward.  In addition to this, Piscotty has stolen three bases while Heyward has stolen only one.

And, by the way, all of these numbers have come in fewer at-bats than Heyward has faced this spring.  Noting these stats, would you rather have Piscotty and Hazelbaker or Heyward?  Again, it is important to note that these are spring numbers and are subject to be completely different in the season, but…?

Next: Opening Day Lineup Prediction

Despite all the gnashing of teeth at this point about the lackluster Cardinals, do you think these former players would be contributing or further complicating these feelings?  I feel that these former players- if with the Cardinals today- would have us all shaking our fists at Mozeliak for keeping them. In short, our current roster is better than the players who departed. Period.