Hoping For Consistency With Colby

by Colby Rasmus

Rasmus takes consistent at-bats in spring training (source: Chris Lee, Post Dispatch)

One of the big stories of the 2010 Cardinal season – unfortunately – was the Colby Rasmus / Tony LaRussa psychodrama that played out in the ugliest way imaginable and derailed the emotional lift of the team right when it counted most. We all know LaRussa has a difficult time accepting and consistently using younger players, but the Rasmus situation was particularly irksome. The organization had finally produced an offensive player with a high ceiling (the last being Pujols in 2001), and he was sitting on the bench because … well, nobody really understands why. I know I spit up blood many nights watching Rasmus come out of a game late as part of the LaRussa Double Switch™.

But it’s that word “consistency” that LaRussa has been batting around in interviews regarding Rasmus’ role on the team this year. LaRussa has been telling everyone who will listen that Colby needs to be “more consistent” and have a “better approach” and “develop a winning attitude.” Here’s a typical quote:

It’s his third full year. It’s still to be determined if he’s going to be a guy who strikes out a lot or a guy who can do something with two strikes.

As a bonafide LaRussa hater, quotes like this one only dig a tiny little knife into my stomach. With LaRussa, it’s always about needling people he doesn’t necessarily like. Rasmus wouldn’t be guaranteed playing time on this club if he hit 55 homers this year. Because when it comes to Colby, he’s always in need of more work.

What truly annoys me is that LaRussa harps on young Colby about being consistent, despite the fact that LaRussa has used the kid INCONSISTENTLY ever since he arrived. What rookie or young player can develop a consistent approach when they are benched while having the highest slugging percentage among NL centerfielders? How can they feel confident of their own position on the club when they are pulled late out of games (despite a plus defense rating) so that Randy F. Winn can play instead??

The mentality and the obfuscation of facts are all right there in that quote. Look at it again. In LaRussa’s mind, this is Rasmus’ THIRD FULL YEAR on the major league team. That is, of course, a lie. Sure, Colby came up in 2009, but did he play a full year? Could we say that he even had a full year last year? Not at all.

For a young player to develop a consistent approach, they need consistent guidance, coaching, and position within the team. These are aspects of the game that LaRussa does not provide someone like Rasmus, and before he continues to needle the kid, he needs to look at his own inconsistent gameplan.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Rasmus better start off hot or he will be doomed to be platooned. Tony has a thing about left handed hitters, they were born to be platooned. Tony would have platooned "The Man" and Brock if he was around when they played. If Tony was around back in the 1920's, he would have platooned Ruth and Gehrig.

No worries. Rasmus is never going to be good enough, no matter what he does. He struck out a lot to be sure, but he still managed to have a fairly productive year, and improved on various areas of his hitting. That part goes unnoticed by most. Rasmus must feel like he's at Georgia Tech; you know what students there say about their institution-"Your best. Still not good enough." Rasmus is never going to be good enough to please LaRussa or the Cardinal fans. He's different. Different isn't a good thing to be in St. Louis.

I think he ends up being traded. Now if they want to do some good with a trade, maybe they see if they can't get a real 3rd baseman-a blockbuster trade and go after David Wright or Ryan Zimmerman.

You lose credibility with a cooment like "As a bonafide LARussa hater........"

I was hoping for an objective analysis on the Rasmus-La Russa "feud."

I was being sarcastic because people accuse me of being a LaRussa hater based on articles like this one:

http://redbirdrants.com/2011/01/01/the-tony-larussa-problem/

I, for one, have NEVER accused you of anything!

LOL NEVER!!!! Man, Dave ... I'm glad you're on my side, buddy!

The reason TLR didn't use Rasmus sometimes last year was apparently because of his astronomical strikeout totals and his refusal to make adjustments with two strikes. I have to admit that I don't always agree with La Russa on some things, but I do with this one. Colby needs to start shortening up his swing with two strikes and just put the bat on the ball.

While it's true that Colby had a higher strikeout ratio than 2009 (and higher than I'd like for sure), you keep your best men in the game when you have a chance to win. I'd like to find a stat that shows how many times Colby was removed from a game around the seventh inning when were down one or two runs - I'll wager it was quite a few. LaRussa always defended this by claiming that people like Randy Winn were better defenders - really? Winn is better than a plus defender like Colby?

When you have a centerfielder has the highest slugging percentage among NL centerfielders, you keep the kid in the game and take your chances with that kind of pop.